<div dir="ltr">Just build 2.1beta4 and it's the same thing.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Duane Howard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:duane.security@gmail.com" target="_blank">duane.security@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">yaml sent off list. This is the only machine I've tried on right now, and I can't use the other one that is similarly configured because it's being used for other stuff at the moment. I did pretty extensive experimentation with 2.0.6 a while back on hardware and didn't see this issue. I'll try installing 2.1 and playing with it later today to see if I can reproduce that way.</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Peter Manev <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:petermanev@gmail.com" target="_blank">petermanev@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Duane Howard <<a href="mailto:duane.security@gmail.com" target="_blank">duane.security@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> strace only shows the process doing constant:<br>
> nanosleep({0, 10000000}, NULL) = 0<br>
> nanosleep({0, 10000000}, NULL) = 0<br>
> nanosleep({0, 10000000}, NULL) = 0<br>
> nanosleep({0, 10000000}, NULL) = 0<br>
> nanosleep({0, 10000000}, NULL) = 0<br>
> nanosleep({0, 10000000}, NULL) = 0<br>
> ....<br>
><br>
<br>
</span>Hmm strange. I have not experianced that before.<br>
Does this happen on any VM or just this one in particular?<br>
Can you switch to 2.1beta4 and see if any difference. Please feel free<br>
to send me your suricata.yaml if you would like - I can see if this is<br>
enough to reproduce the issue.<br>
<br>
thanks<br>
<div><div><br>
<br>
><br>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Duane Howard <<a href="mailto:duane.security@gmail.com" target="_blank">duane.security@gmail.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> I can reproduce. I ran it on a single low volume real NIC with the same<br>
>> result. Nothing terribly interesting in suricata.log with -vv enabled:<br>
>> Here's the logs after rule and config loading:<br>
>><br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:14:06 - <Info> - Core dump size set to unlimited.<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:14:06 - <Info> - Unified2-alert initialized: filename<br>
>> suricata.u2, limit 128 MB<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:14:06 - <Info> - Syslog output initialized<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:14:06 - <Info> - Unable to find af-packet config for<br>
>> interface "eth0" or "default", using default value<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:14:06 - <Info> - Going to use 1 thread(s)<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:14:06 - <Info> - Enabling zero copy mode<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:14:06 - <Info> - RunModeIdsAFPWorkers initialised<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:14:06 - <Notice> - all 1 packet processing threads, 3<br>
>> management threads initialized, engine started.<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:14:06 - <Info> - Using interface 'eth0' via socket 7<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:14:06 - <Info> - All AFP capture threads are running.<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:14:06 - <Info> - Thread AFPacketeth01 using socket 7<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:14:06 - <Info> - Starting to read on AFPacketeth01<br>
>> ^C30/7/2015 -- 21:15:27 - <Notice> - Signal Received. Stopping engine.<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:15:27 - <Info> - 0 new flows, 0 established flows were<br>
>> timed out, 0 flows in closed state<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:15:28 - <Info> - time elapsed 81.925s<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:15:28 - <Info> - (AFPacketeth01) Kernel: Packets 3372,<br>
>> dropped 0<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:15:28 - <Info> - (AFPacketeth01) Packets 3345, bytes<br>
>> 1318862<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:15:28 - <Info> - Stream TCP processed 2723 TCP packets<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:15:28 - <Info> - (AFPacketeth01) Alerts 0<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:15:28 - <Info> - Alert unified2 module wrote 0 alerts<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:15:28 - <Info> - host memory usage: 390144 bytes, maximum:<br>
>> 16777216<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:15:28 - <Info> - cleaning up signature grouping<br>
>> structure... complete<br>
>> 30/7/2015 -- 21:15:28 - <Notice> - Stats for 'eth0': pkts: 3372, drop: 0<br>
>> (0.00%), invalid chksum: 0<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Peter Manev <<a href="mailto:petermanev@gmail.com" target="_blank">petermanev@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> On 30 jul 2015, at 21:50, Duane Howard <<a href="mailto:duane.security@gmail.com" target="_blank">duane.security@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Can you reproduce this problem at will? Anything in verbose mode in<br>
>>> Suricata.log?<br>
>>><br>
>>> Can you narrow it down to a relation of a single interface configuration<br>
>>> (as you mention in your initial mail)?<br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> This is Suricata version 2.0.8 RELEASE<br>
>>> Features: PCAP_SET_BUFF LIBPCAP_VERSION_MAJOR=1 PF_RING AF_PACKET<br>
>>> HAVE_PACKET_FANOUT LIBCAP_NG LIBNET1.1 HAVE_HTP_URI_NORMALIZE_HOOK<br>
>>> SIMD support: none<br>
>>> Atomic intrisics: 1 2 4 8 byte(s)<br>
>>> 64-bits, Little-endian architecture<br>
>>> GCC version 4.6.3, C version 199901<br>
>>> compiled with -fstack-protector<br>
>>> compiled with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2<br>
>>> L1 cache line size (CLS)=64<br>
>>> compiled with LibHTP v0.5.17, linked against LibHTP v0.5.17<br>
>>> Suricata Configuration:<br>
>>> AF_PACKET support: yes<br>
>>> PF_RING support: yes<br>
>>> NFQueue support: no<br>
>>> NFLOG support: no<br>
>>> IPFW support: no<br>
>>> DAG enabled: no<br>
>>> Napatech enabled: no<br>
>>> Unix socket enabled: no<br>
>>> Detection enabled: yes<br>
>>><br>
>>> libnss support: no<br>
>>> libnspr support: no<br>
>>> libjansson support: no<br>
>>> Prelude support: no<br>
>>> PCRE jit: no<br>
>>> LUA support: no<br>
>>> libluajit: no<br>
>>> libgeoip: yes<br>
>>> Non-bundled htp: yes<br>
>>> Old barnyard2 support: no<br>
>>> CUDA enabled: no<br>
>>><br>
>>> Suricatasc install: yes<br>
>>><br>
>>> Unit tests enabled: no<br>
>>> Debug output enabled: no<br>
>>> Debug validation enabled: no<br>
>>> Profiling enabled: no<br>
>>> Profiling locks enabled: no<br>
>>> Coccinelle / spatch: no<br>
>>><br>
>>> Generic build parameters:<br>
>>> Installation prefix (--prefix): /usr<br>
>>> Configuration directory (--sysconfdir): /etc/suricata/<br>
>>> Log directory (--localstatedir) : /var/log/suricata/<br>
>>><br>
>>> Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu<br>
>>> GCC binary: gcc<br>
>>> GCC Protect enabled: no<br>
>>> GCC march native enabled: no<br>
>>> GCC Profile enabled: no<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Peter Manev <<a href="mailto:petermanev@gmail.com" target="_blank">petermanev@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On 30 jul 2015, at 20:58, Duane Howard <<a href="mailto:duane.security@gmail.com" target="_blank">duane.security@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> When closing suri it reports 0 packets for the interface I'm mainly<br>
>>>> concerned with. There's also nothing in fast or other logs to indicate<br>
>>>> traffic.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> 30/7/2015 -- 19:58:41 - <Notice> - Stats for 'bond0': pkts: 0, drop: 0<br>
>>>> (-nan%), invalid chksum: 0<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> What is the output of suricata --build-info ?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> If you have perf tools installed have a look at what in Suricata uses<br>
>>>> the most CPU -<br>
>>>> perf top -p pidofsuri<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Thanks<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Alan Wanderley dos Santos<br>
>>>> <<a href="mailto:alan.santos@rnp.br" target="_blank">alan.santos@rnp.br</a>> wrote:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Didi you see the fast.log and others logs?<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Maybe there are some traffic (icmp or broadcast for example) coming to<br>
>>>>> virtual machine, even little being data, can generated a lot of logs and<br>
>>>>> degree the performance.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> I had a similar situation on a VM of testing.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Just a shot into darkness rsrs<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Regards,<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> -----------------------------------------------<br>
>>>>> Alan Santos<br>
>>>>> Analista de Segurança<br>
>>>>> Centro de Atendimento a Incidentes de Segurança (CAIS)<br>
>>>>> Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa (RNP)<br>
>>>>> (19) 3787-3314 | <a href="mailto:alan.santos@rnp.br" target="_blank">alan.santos@rnp.br</a><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> ________________________________<br>
>>>>> De: "Duane Howard" <<a href="mailto:duane.security@gmail.com" target="_blank">duane.security@gmail.com</a>><br>
>>>>> Para: "oisf-users" <<a href="mailto:oisf-users@openinfosecfoundation.org" target="_blank">oisf-users@openinfosecfoundation.org</a>><br>
>>>>> Enviadas: Quinta-feira, 30 de julho de 2015 16:50:51<br>
>>>>> Assunto: [Oisf-users] Suricata using 35% cpu with no load?<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> I've got a random virtual testing machine, and I'm seeing Suricata<br>
>>>>> sitting at about 35% CPU load, even though there's absolutely no traffic<br>
>>>>> heading to it at the moment. Is there an easy way to get Suricata to tell me<br>
>>>>> what it's doing that would cause this? It occurs on real interfaces with low<br>
>>>>> traffic, loopback, as well as bonds where there's no trafic.<br>
>>>>> ./d<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>>> Suricata IDS Users mailing list: <a href="mailto:oisf-users@openinfosecfoundation.org" target="_blank">oisf-users@openinfosecfoundation.org</a><br>
>>>>> Site: <a href="http://suricata-ids.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://suricata-ids.org</a> | Support:<br>
>>>>> <a href="http://suricata-ids.org/support/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://suricata-ids.org/support/</a><br>
>>>>> List:<br>
>>>>> <a href="https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users</a><br>
>>>>> Suricata User Conference November 4 & 5 in Barcelona:<br>
>>>>> <a href="http://oisfevents.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://oisfevents.net</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>> Suricata IDS Users mailing list: <a href="mailto:oisf-users@openinfosecfoundation.org" target="_blank">oisf-users@openinfosecfoundation.org</a><br>
>>>> Site: <a href="http://suricata-ids.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://suricata-ids.org</a> | Support:<br>
>>>> <a href="http://suricata-ids.org/support/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://suricata-ids.org/support/</a><br>
>>>> List:<br>
>>>> <a href="https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users</a><br>
>>>> Suricata User Conference November 4 & 5 in Barcelona:<br>
>>>> <a href="http://oisfevents.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://oisfevents.net</a><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div><span><font color="#888888">--<br>
Regards,<br>
Peter Manev<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>