<div dir="ltr">It should - in my experience you will need to make sure to set options (like promisc) on the bonded interface as well as the two physical interfaces, but it should work as expected.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:29 AM, erik clark <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:philosnef@gmail.com" target="_blank">philosnef@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I cant find a clear answer on this. Does af_packet work appropriately on a bond interface of two interfaces that are af_packet capable? Thanks!<div><br></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Suricata IDS Users mailing list: <a href="mailto:oisf-users@openinfosecfoundation.org">oisf-users@<wbr>openinfosecfoundation.org</a><br>
Site: <a href="http://suricata-ids.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://suricata-ids.org</a> | Support: <a href="http://suricata-ids.org/support/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://suricata-ids.org/<wbr>support/</a><br>
List: <a href="https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.<wbr>openinfosecfoundation.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/oisf-users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>