<div dir="auto">The assumption without any evidence or testing is that it would work fine. On FreeBSD there have been some new presentations on the use of netmap/vale to support network monitoring of this type.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br><br><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" dir="auto">--<br>Michael Shirk<br>Daemon Security, Inc.<br><a href="https://www.daemon-security.com">https://www.daemon-security.com</a></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Aug 21, 2017 1:18 PM, "Shawn Venti" <<a href="mailto:smventi944@gmail.com">smventi944@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hello,<div><br></div><div>Has anyone had experience with running a Suricata instance with Netmap mode but connected to a virtual port on a VALE switch opposed to a physical NIC?</div><div><br></div><div>Thank You</div><div><br></div><div>Shawn</div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Suricata IDS Users mailing list: <a href="mailto:oisf-users@openinfosecfoundation.org">oisf-users@<wbr>openinfosecfoundation.org</a><br>
Site: <a href="http://suricata-ids.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://suricata-ids.org</a> | Support: <a href="http://suricata-ids.org/support/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://suricata-ids.org/<wbr>support/</a><br>
List: <a href="https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.<wbr>openinfosecfoundation.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/oisf-users</a><br>
<br>
Conference: <a href="https://suricon.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://suricon.net</a><br>
Trainings: <a href="https://suricata-ids.org/training/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://suricata-ids.org/<wbr>training/</a><br></blockquote></div></div>