[Discussion] Non-tokenized preprocessor parameter lines
Martin Fong
martin.fong at sri.com
Fri Feb 6 21:25:11 UTC 2009
Matt Jonkman wrote:
> Non-tokenized preprocessor parameter lines
Let me rephrase this into what I'd like (versus definition by
negation): It would be great if processor arguments could (optionally)
_include_ newlines to permit line-oriented parameter definition. For
example, this would allow
allow newlines
preprocessor myPreprocessor: \
threshold = 1.0 # a description \
max_count = 10 # another description
disallow newlines
where "[dis]allow newlines" would dictate the parameter token scanner
behavior.
As a side issue, I'd also like more functionality in the mSplit
() replacement. Specifically, it would be nice if it accepted 0
(zero) for max_strs and then dynamically allocate the requisite
members, particularly when the input is user-specified and thus
causing the maximum to be relatively unpredictable (e.g., IP
blacklists).
Cheers!
...Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5193 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20090206/7a6c7c64/attachment.bin>
More information about the Discussion
mailing list