[Discussion] Suricata Inline Mode FreeBSD BRIDGING

Will Metcalf william.metcalf at gmail.com
Fri May 21 13:30:08 UTC 2010


Thanks Nick!

Regards,

Will

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:13 AM,  <nick at rogness.net> wrote:
> It is not a problem with suricata.
>
> At one point in the past divert sockets could not handle  bridged frames.  I believe this was addressed with a sysctl knob.  Checkout 'man divert' and 'man ipfw'.
>
>
> Nick
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry Smartphone provided by Alltel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Will Metcalf <william.metcalf at gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 22:49:56
> To: Miler Alberto Garcia Villanueva<phl4kx at gmail.com>
> Cc: <discussion at openinfosecfoundation.org>
> Subject: Re: [Discussion] Suricata Inline Mode FreeBSD BRIDGING
>
> hmmm can IPFW divert sockets not be used in conjunction with a bridge
> on FreeBSD?  I'm not that familiar....
>
> Regards,
>
> Will
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Miler Alberto Garcia Villanueva
> <phl4kx at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all, can I run Suricata in inlineMode (IPS) with FreeBSD driver
>> socket in Transparent firewall (Bridging), is possible or I have to
>> use linux?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discussion mailing list
>> Discussion at openinfosecfoundation.org
>> http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at openinfosecfoundation.org
> http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion
>



More information about the Discussion mailing list