[Discussion] Suricata 2.0.1 logging
Lance Lassetter
lancelassetter at gmail.com
Tue May 27 14:35:31 UTC 2014
On May 26, 2014 8:01 AM, Victor Julien <lists at inliniac.net> wrote:
>
> Please keep the conversation on the list.
>
> On 05/26/2014 02:54 PM, Lance Lassetter wrote:
> > It is attached, thanks.
>
> It's clear that Suricata is not seeing any traffic. If you use the
> normal (non-REPEAT mode), does it work then?
>
> > On May 26, 2014 3:45 AM, Victor Julien <lists at inliniac.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 05/24/2014 05:12 PM, Lance Lassetter wrote:
> >>> Fedora just upgraded their stable repos to Suricata 2.0.1 and now nothing is logged with the version 2 and IPS mode. All logfiles are created and I "iptables -vL" the NFQUEUE is seeing packets in Suricata IPS repeat mode. Everything looks correct and I parsed and updated the new suricata.yaml.rpmnew and renamed it to suricata.yaml then restarted Suricata. I even deleted the old logfiles and let suricata create the new ones in either /var/log/suricata or /var/log/IPS.
> >>>
> >>> Once again the logfiles are created by starting Suricata and waiting a minute but they are all blank except for stats.log.
> >>
> >> Can you share a record of your stats.log?
>
If I have iptables nfqueue set to queue 0 and suricata.yaml is set to the same, why wouldn't it work? Also fast.log is empty if enabled.
Lance
More information about the Discussion
mailing list