[Oisf-devel] removing unified1 output

[Dave Remien]

Go for it!

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Victor Julien <victor at inliniac.net> wrote:

> Hey ppl, is anyone opposed to us removing the unified1 output? We're
> going to do some refactoring of the output modules to fix bug #264. The
> lesser work we need to do the better.
>
> Unified2 + Baryard2 seems to be far superior to unified1+barnyard, both
> in general and in the Suricata implementation. So I'm thinking we should
> remove unified1.
>
> Objections? Opinions? +1's, -1's?
>
> Cheers,
> Victor
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------
> Victor Julien
> http://www.inliniac.net/
> PGP: http://www.inliniac.net/victorjulien.asc
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oisf-devel mailing list
> Oisf-devel at openinfosecfoundation.org
> http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-devel
>



-- 
"Of course, someone who knows more about this will correct me if I'm
wrong, and someone who knows less will correct me if I'm right."
David Palmer (palmer at tybalt.caltech.edu)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-devel/attachments/20111003/ee44a3e9/attachment-0002.html>