[Oisf-devel] removing unified1 output

[Josh White]

Kill it.

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:51 AM, William Metcalf
<william.metcalf at gmail.com>wrote:

> Kill it :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Will
>
> On Oct 3, 2011, at 7:04 AM, Victor Julien <victor at inliniac.net> wrote:
>
> > Hey ppl, is anyone opposed to us removing the unified1 output? We're
> > going to do some refactoring of the output modules to fix bug #264. The
> > lesser work we need to do the better.
> >
> > Unified2 + Baryard2 seems to be far superior to unified1+barnyard, both
> > in general and in the Suricata implementation. So I'm thinking we should
> > remove unified1.
> >
> > Objections? Opinions? +1's, -1's?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Victor
> >
> > --
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > Victor Julien
> > http://www.inliniac.net/
> > PGP: http://www.inliniac.net/victorjulien.asc
> > ---------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Oisf-devel mailing list
> > Oisf-devel at openinfosecfoundation.org
> > http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-devel
> _______________________________________________
> Oisf-devel mailing list
> Oisf-devel at openinfosecfoundation.org
> http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-devel/attachments/20111003/25089404/attachment-0002.html>