[Oisf-devel] Mem leaks

[Chris Wakelin]

I was wondering whether Anoop's ac fixes (b7b580) might be the issue,
but I'm not at all sure. It might be that my cores sizes are bigger
anyway because I switched from b2g to ac. Getting them every time I
killed suricata certainly brought their size to my attention :(

I'll try the latest git master for a bit! Might even try runmode=worker :)

Best Wishes,
Chris

On 06/10/11 15:32, Victor Julien wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 04:30 PM, Martin Holste wrote:
>> Yeah, maybe, but the baseline is almost double.  Do you want me to
>> switch back to master for awhile?
> 
> If you can, please. The bigger baseline is certainly unintentional, so
> we'll look into that as well.
> 
> Btw, I think Eric fixed the pfring shutdown thing as well in the updated
> master.
> 
> Cheers,
> Victor
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Victor Julien <victor at inliniac.net> wrote:
>>> So could it be that the master just has a higher baseline but stops
>>> growing at some point as well? The higher baseline might be explained by
>>> some AC pattern matcher updates.
>>>
>>> On 10/06/2011 02:59 AM, Martin Holste wrote:
>>>> bc5, still no leaks.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Victor Julien <victor at inliniac.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/05/2011 11:41 PM, Martin Holste wrote:
>>>>>> Seems to be no leaks thus far after 4 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what git ref is it you are running now exactly? Lost track.
>>>>>

-- 
--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+-
Christopher Wakelin,                           c.d.wakelin at reading.ac.uk
IT Services Centre, The University of Reading,  Tel: +44 (0)118 378 2908
Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AF, UK              Fax: +44 (0)118 975 3094