[Oisf-devel] Mem leaks

[Victor Julien]

On 10/06/2011 04:46 PM, Chris Wakelin wrote:
> I was wondering whether Anoop's ac fixes (b7b580) might be the issue,
> but I'm not at all sure. It might be that my cores sizes are bigger
> anyway because I switched from b2g to ac. Getting them every time I
> killed suricata certainly brought their size to my attention :(

It might have caused higher mem usage, but it shouldn't have introduced
a mem leak if that is what you're seeing.

> 
> I'll try the latest git master for a bit! Might even try runmode=worker :)

Sweet :)


> Best Wishes,
> Chris
> 
> On 06/10/11 15:32, Victor Julien wrote:
>> On 10/06/2011 04:30 PM, Martin Holste wrote:
>>> Yeah, maybe, but the baseline is almost double.  Do you want me to
>>> switch back to master for awhile?
>>
>> If you can, please. The bigger baseline is certainly unintentional, so
>> we'll look into that as well.
>>
>> Btw, I think Eric fixed the pfring shutdown thing as well in the updated
>> master.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Victor
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Victor Julien <victor at inliniac.net> wrote:
>>>> So could it be that the master just has a higher baseline but stops
>>>> growing at some point as well? The higher baseline might be explained by
>>>> some AC pattern matcher updates.
>>>>
>>>> On 10/06/2011 02:59 AM, Martin Holste wrote:
>>>>> bc5, still no leaks.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Victor Julien <victor at inliniac.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/05/2011 11:41 PM, Martin Holste wrote:
>>>>>>> Seems to be no leaks thus far after 4 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what git ref is it you are running now exactly? Lost track.
>>>>>>
> 


-- 
---------------------------------------------
Victor Julien
http://www.inliniac.net/
PGP: http://www.inliniac.net/victorjulien.asc
---------------------------------------------