[Oisf-devel] Mem leaks
Chris Wakelin
c.d.wakelin at reading.ac.uk
Tue Oct 18 10:38:09 UTC 2011
On 18/10/11 11:27, Anoop Saldanha wrote:
>>
>> And this with a non-optimized ac-gfbs. With optimizations it should
>> fare a lot better. Would be interesting to see how much out of 10gigs
>> is taken by ac. I recollect the engine not crossing 1.8gigs on 13k
>> rules with ac-gfbs:full and 350megs with single. Of course there's no
>> absolute co-relation between no of rules and ac mem usage though, but
>> would be good to profile it.
>>
>> --
>> Anoop Saldanha
>>
>
> Any more perf reports/stats with ac-gfbs + high traffic?
>
Memory usage was less, starting at 2GB or so but gradually increasing to
5GB as opposed to 8-9GB with ac. However, it seemed I was missing more
alerts, which might be due to other factors - I'm running with "ac" at
the moment and still seem to be missing some. None of my cores are
particular busy with either ac or ac-gfbs.
Best Wishes,
Chris
--
--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+-
Christopher Wakelin, c.d.wakelin at reading.ac.uk
IT Services Centre, The University of Reading, Tel: +44 (0)118 378 2908
Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AF, UK Fax: +44 (0)118 975 3094
More information about the Oisf-devel
mailing list