[Oisf-devel] new segfault on suricata v1.4 because wrong conf

[Nikolay Denev]

On Dec 26, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Peter Manev <petermanev at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 11:37 PM, rmkml <rmkml at yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> First, Merry Christmas everyone!
> 
> I have a new segfault on Suricata v1.4 with my wrong conf like this:
> 
> # comment good conf:
> # HTTPS_PORTS: 443
> # and enable wrong conf:
>  HTTPS_PORTS: [443,A]
> 
> cause segfault. (yes Im missed two ")
> 
> Regards
> Rmkml
> 
> http://twitter.com/rmkml
> _______________________________________________
> Suricata IDS Devel mailing list: oisf-devel at openinfosecfoundation.org
> Site: http://suricata-ids.org | Participate: http://suricata-ids.org/participate/
> List: https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-devel
> Redmine: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/
> 
> Hi rmkml,
> 
> Merry Christmas to you to.
> 
> so is the segfault because of the missing two "" or is it because of the "A" ?
> 
> thank you
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Peter Manev
> _______________________________________________
> Suricata IDS Devel mailing list: oisf-devel at openinfosecfoundation.org
> Site: http://suricata-ids.org | Participate: http://suricata-ids.org/participate/
> List: https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-devel
> Redmine: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/

Hi,

I had similar segfault when adding only numeric ports, which disappeared when I added the quotes.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-devel/attachments/20121226/7ee9d453/attachment-0002.html>