[Oisf-devel] libhtp 0.5.x integration - bug 775
Victor Julien
victor at inliniac.net
Tue Apr 9 09:06:07 UTC 2013
(bad juju to brian and ivan for top posting and/or html emails! :)
On 04/09/2013 10:21 AM, Ivan Ristic wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Anoop Saldanha <anoopsaldanha at gmail.com
> <mailto:anoopsaldanha at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Brian Rectanus <brectanu at gmail.com
> <mailto:brectanu at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Brian Rectanus <brectanu at gmail.com
> <mailto:brectanu at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Anoop Saldanha
> <anoopsaldanha at gmail.com <mailto:anoopsaldanha at gmail.com>>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Victor Julien
> <victor at inliniac.net <mailto:victor at inliniac.net>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > (moving to oisf-devel)
> >>> >
> >>> > On 04/08/2013 06:17 AM, Anoop Saldanha wrote:
> >>> >>>> I recollect we introduced path and query double decoding
> through
> >>> >>>> configurable params, and also we had this thing with query
> >>> >>>> decoding(single level). Can you explain a bit what the
> status was
> >>> >>>> previously. Seeing related failed uts.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> We run the path normalization on the query through our
> >>> >>> HTPCallbackRequestUriNormalizeQuery callback. Previously we used
> >>> >>> htp_decode_path_inplace to normalize the query (e.g. for
> >>> >>> uridecoding).
> >>> >>> However, this was causing issues (remember that pcre "bug" we
> >>> >>> discussed
> >>> >>> a while back, where http:// turned into http:/).
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> In libhtp I copied htp_decode_path_inplace to
> >>> >>> htp_decode_query_inplace
> >>> >>> and also copied the config params and cfg funcs:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> https://github.com/inliniac/suricata/commit/d41c762689a08e6814dc93e8bfebeceab97175c3
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Hack of the 1st order, which is wrong in many ways. But it
> basically
> >>> >>> allowed me to make sure we don't normalize the query as if
> it's path,
> >>> >>> esp with turning ftp:// into ftp:/ and such.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> For 0.5 integration I think we need a proper solution. The only
> >>> >>> reason I
> >>> >>> pushed my hack like this was that I knew in 0.5 we would
> make things
> >>> >>> right.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I think if we still want to double decode, we still require
> all of
> >>> >> these above things from our bundled htp.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> -----
> >>> >>
> >>> >> In 0.5.x, tx->request_uri_normalized has been removed, and
> we'd now
> >>> >> have to use the REQUEST_URI hook. We'll have to carry out the
> >>> >> reconstruction ourselves, and store it ourselves in our HTPState.
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>> What are your thoughts on this?
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> > IIRC there is some function in libhtp that does just the
> decoding of
> >>> > uriencoding and unicode. We should probably just use that on
> the query
> >>> > and do the full normalization on the path.
> >>> >
> >>> > As a side thought: I think it would be nice to store path and
> query
> >>> > separately so that we can add http_path and http_query
> keywords later
> >>> > on.
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> We'd pretty much extract it directly from parsed_uri. Will have to
> >>> check if we need the extract double decode phase we have
> currently in
> >>> our bundled htp, in which case we'd need to store them separately.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, all the normalized components are in tx->parsed_uri. This
> is what is
> >> used in ironbee to expose all the various parts like
> tx->parsed_uri->path
> >> and tx->parsed_uri->query.
> >>
> >> Also note that the hostname should now be obtained from
> >> tx->request_hostname in 0.5.
> >>
> >> -B
> >
> >
> > FYI, for an example using libhtp 0.5 see ironbee code. This was all
> > recently updated for 0.5.
> >
> > https://github.com/ironbee/ironbee/blob/0.7.x/modules/modhtp.c
> >
>
> Will have a look. Thanks.
>
> Previously we would use tx->connp->conn->transactions to access txs
> in the state. Now that htp_connp_t is an opaque pointer how do I
> access the txs? Tried locating helper functions to retrieve it, but I
> didn't find any.
>
> It's an oversight that there isn't a helper function to retrieve
> transactions on a connections. I will add one tomorrow.
>
> Having said that, what is your use case that you require to retrieve
> transactions? I thought your code was driven by the callbacks, which > all
> come with a tx instance (via connp)? For my education, can you explain
> how you process connection data?
>
>
One of the things that we don't do out of the callbacks is logging the
requests. This is one of the things we need access to the TX store for.
--
---------------------------------------------
Victor Julien
http://www.inliniac.net/
PGP: http://www.inliniac.net/victorjulien.asc
---------------------------------------------
More information about the Oisf-devel
mailing list