[Oisf-devel] libhtp upgrade

Victor Julien victor at inliniac.net
Thu Jul 11 10:09:30 UTC 2013


On 07/11/2013 12:07 PM, Peter Manev wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Victor Julien <victor at inliniac.net> wrote:
>> On 07/09/2013 05:30 PM, Anoop Saldanha wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Peter Manev <petermanev at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Victor Julien <victor at inliniac.net> wrote:
>>>>> Anoop's work to upgrade our libhtp support to 0.5.x is pretty much done
>>>>> and ready to be merged.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this is a good moment to reconsider how we distribute libhtp.
>>>>> Currently we have it merged in our git repo. This is convenient for the
>>>>> users, as they always have the correct libhtp.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, it's a major hassle for us devs, as we need to keep it in sync
>>>>> with the official libhtp. So I would like to remove libhtp from our git
>>>>> repo.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it is still a good idea to bundle libhtp in our tarball though,
>>>>> that way users will still be able to have the hassle free experience.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any thoughts about this? I was thinking to just script up the tarball
>>>>> creation to include a checkout of libhtp. Not sure how easy it will be
>>>>> to make our autotools play well with this though.
>>>>
>>>> As long as the stable version's tarball has it (the way it is now)  -
>>>> it is ok for the  the PPA packaging stuff I think, even though we
>>>> compile with non-bundled-htp.
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 on non-bundled htp.  Easier to stay with the libhtp mainline.
>>> Bundling it along with the suricata tarball seems convenient enough.
>>>
>>
>> So for 2.0beta1 and up we'll no longer have libhtp in our git tree. This
>> will require some adjusting to our dev set ups, but nothing big I think.
>> For release tarballs we'll just bundle the latests htp lib, so that for
>> users nothing changes.
>>
>>
>> In this branch I've updated the autotools we use to work both if a local
>> libhtp dir exists and when it does not exist.
>>
>> https://github.com/inliniac/suricata/tree/htp-autotools
>>
>> The beef of the change is moving all conditionals from the Makefile.am
>> files into configure.ac:
>>
>> https://github.com/inliniac/suricata/commit/aafc65c7578f5cdd1b6159f61e98cb1923fc0358
>>
>> This makes sure the build sys doesn't error out if the local libhtp/ dir
>> does not exist.
>>
>> I additionally changed the way we generate the src/build-info.h. I had
>> seen errors with it before, but now for some reason they became more
>> apparent. Please check:
>>
>> https://github.com/inliniac/suricata/commit/4749420f325acc5965cd942d78ba9ce28c686eda
>>
>> I will probably merge this branch tomorrow, so please take a moment
>> today to review it.
>>
> 
> I will test it today.
> In what way should the patches/commits be applied
> 
> 1) https://github.com/inliniac/suricata/tree/htp-autotools
> 2) https://github.com/inliniac/suricata/commit/aafc65c7578f5cdd1b6159f61e98cb1923fc0358
> 3) https://github.com/inliniac/suricata/commit/4749420f325acc5965cd942d78ba9ce28c686eda
> 

Just check out the branch
https://github.com/inliniac/suricata/tree/htp-autotools, it contains
both patches.

-- 
---------------------------------------------
Victor Julien
http://www.inliniac.net/
PGP: http://www.inliniac.net/victorjulien.asc
---------------------------------------------




More information about the Oisf-devel mailing list