[Oisf-devel] libhtp - do not store non key-value param in query
Ivan Ristic
ivan.ristic at gmail.com
Wed Jun 19 09:41:46 UTC 2013
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Anoop Saldanha <anoopsaldanha at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Ivan Ristic <ivan.ristic at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Anoop Saldanha <anoopsaldanha at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Anoop Saldanha <anoopsaldanha at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> ?name1&name2=value2
>>>> ?name1=&name2=value2
>>>>
>>>> In both these query strings, for param "name1", param->value is
>>>> non-NULL and len 0.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe for the first query string, we should set the param->value
>>>> as NULL, so that we can differentiate it from the second query where
>>>> name1 is in the key-value format but without the value set?
>>
>> I don't find it natural to use NULL. In both cases the parameter
>> exists, which -- to me -- means it has to have a value.
>>
>> Do you have a use case where the difference matters?
>>
>
> Yes. In my case I am trying to generate the query string using the
> individual params, and I'd need to know whether it was in the form of
> a key-value in the raw query or not, based on which I'd append a "="
> after the param name.
Why are you reconstructing the query string that way? Why not just
take the query (as a single string), and perform URL decoding on it?
Seems to me it amounts to the same thing, only easier to implement.
>> It's not a change I would want to introduce in 0.5.x, because at the
>> moment value is guaranteed/expected to not be NULL.
>>
>>
>>> P.S: I have also asked the above question in the mail thread - "libhtp
>>> 0.5.x integration - bug 775" on oisf-devel. Please ignore that.
>>>
>
> --
> -------------------------------
> Anoop Saldanha
> http://www.poona.me
> -------------------------------
--
Ivan Ristić
More information about the Oisf-devel
mailing list