[Oisf-users] max-pending-packets maxing out at 65,000

Peter Manev petermanev at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 15:54:04 UTC 2011


http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/hardware/795/specs.html

looks cheap :)

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Josh White <josh at securemind.org> wrote:

> IBM Power 795
> Power7 CPU(s) (4.25GHz with so called "Turbocore")
>
> Memory is a bit lacking compared to an Intel or a cheaper AMD Opteron
>
> "L2 256KB"
> "L3 8MB"
>
> Still I'm anxious to see how it performs.
>
> Josh
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Will Metcalf <william.metcalf at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Josh will have to answer for sure but I did see this roaming around
>> outside of his office building...
>>
>> http://yfrog.com/h3puwrp
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Will
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Martin Holste <mcholste at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Holy crap, 128 cores?  What is the architecture?
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Victor Julien <victor at inliniac.net>
>> wrote:
>> >> On 12/10/2011 04:48 PM, Josh White wrote:
>> >>> Victor,
>> >>>
>> >>> No reason, just curious. Planning on running a test on a 128 Core /
>> 256GB
>> >>> and try pushing things to the maximum limits.
>> >>
>> >> Thats a lot of cores :) What do the specs look like?
>> >>
>> >> Let me know if you need guidance/ideas to configure optimally for this.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Victor
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for the quick response!
>> >>>
>> >>> Josh
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Victor Julien <victor at inliniac.net>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On 12/10/2011 07:35 AM, Josh White wrote:
>> >>>>> I appear to be hitting a ceiling of 65,000 packets when setting
>> >>>>> max-pending-packets. If I set it to anything higher, even "66,000"
>> >>>> Suricata
>> >>>>> fails to start.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ---
>> >>>>> suricata -c /etc/suricata/suricata.yaml -i eth0
>> >>>>> [3037] 10/12/2011 -- 01:29:11 - (suricata.c:649) <Info> (main) --
>> This is
>> >>>>> Suricata version 1.1 (rev )
>> >>>>> [3037] 10/12/2011 -- 01:29:11 - (util-cpu.c:171) <Info>
>> >>>>> (UtilCpuPrintSummary) -- CPUs/cores online: 24
>> >>>>> [3037] 10/12/2011 -- 01:29:11 - (util-ioctl.c:85) <Info>
>> (GetIfaceMTU) --
>> >>>>> Failure when trying to get MTU via ioctl: 19
>> >>>>> [3037] 10/12/2011 -- 01:29:11 - (detect-pcre.c:128) <Info>
>> >>>>> (DetectPcreRegister) -- Using PCRE match-limit setting of: 3500
>> >>>>> [3037] 10/12/2011 -- 01:29:11 - (detect-pcre.c:138) <Info>
>> >>>>> (DetectPcreRegister) -- Using PCRE match-limit-recursion setting
>> of: 1500
>> >>>>> ---
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Can anyone tell me why? Is this a hard set limit?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Yeah it's a hard limit. Our packet pool is a lockless ringbuffer that
>> >>>> can contain USHRT_MAX, so 65535 packets.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Any reason to need more?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------
>> >>>> Victor Julien
>> >>>> http://www.inliniac.net/
>> >>>> PGP: http://www.inliniac.net/victorjulien.asc
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Oisf-users mailing list
>> >>>> Oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org
>> >>>> http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> ---------------------------------------------
>> >> Victor Julien
>> >> http://www.inliniac.net/
>> >> PGP: http://www.inliniac.net/victorjulien.asc
>> >> ---------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Oisf-users mailing list
>> >> Oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org
>> >> http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Oisf-users mailing list
>> > Oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org
>> > http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oisf-users mailing list
>> Oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org
>> http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oisf-users mailing list
> Oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org
> http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
>
>


-- 
Peter Manev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-users/attachments/20111214/550cdcf0/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Oisf-users mailing list