[Oisf-users] removing unfied1 output

[Martin Holste]

+1 to remove it

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Victor Julien <victor at inliniac.net> wrote:
> Anyone opposed to us removing the unified1 output? We're going to do
> some refactoring of the output modules to fix bug #264. The lesser work
> we need to do the better.
>
> Unified2 + Baryard2 seems to be far superior to unified1 + barnyard
> 0.2.0, both in general and in the Suricata implementation. So I'm
> thinking we should remove unified1.
>
> The oisf-devel list was already pretty much unanimous, but wanted to
> check with you users too :)
>
> Objections? Opinions? +1's, -1's?
>
> Cheers,
> Victor
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------
> Victor Julien
> http://www.inliniac.net/
> PGP: http://www.inliniac.net/victorjulien.asc
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oisf-users mailing list
> Oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org
> http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
>