[Oisf-users] IPv6 & Extension header

[Michel SABORDE]

I just tried my previous tests with the current git version and ipv6
support is much much better.
I think, you should consider adding a note on the website to tell people
who wants a real IPv6 support no to use the current stable version but use
the git instead.

Michel
Le 2 avril 2012 08:44, Victor Julien <victor at inliniac.net> a écrit :

> Cool, thanks for checking.
>
> On 03/30/2012 09:50 PM, rmkml wrote:
> > Sorry for disturb Victor,
> > It's not a FP.
> > Regards
> > Rmkml
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, rmkml wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Victor,
> >>
> >> First, big thx you for your time and skills!
> >>
> >> Yes maybe a new FP with ip_proto option on ipv6 cause FP...
> >> In my memory, if you create a rule with alert ip ... ip_proto:30, with
> >> ipv6 pcap: suricata fire...
> >> Can you check? if confirm Im open a new ticket on redmine.
> >>
> >> Best Regards
> >> Rmkml
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012, Victor Julien wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 03/29/2012 11:58 PM, rmkml wrote:
> >>>> and Im found a new FP!
> >>>
> >>> What did you find?
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------
> Victor Julien
> http://www.inliniac.net/
> PGP: http://www.inliniac.net/victorjulien.asc
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oisf-users mailing list
> Oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org
> http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-users/attachments/20120402/4c8f69b4/attachment-0002.html>