[Oisf-users] Suricata with PF_RING on latest git

[Peter Bates]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hello all

On 06/07/2012 16:12, Doug Burks wrote:
> Interesting, that BPF issue is definitely a potential gotcha for
> us. Does anybody know if this is still an issue with newer versions
> of pfring?

I'm running:
PF_RING Version     : 5.4.3 ($Revision: 5441$)
Transparent mode    : Yes (mode 0)

with a couple of different applications with different BPF filters
that are built with PF_RING and another application that isn't - and
they all seem to be happily seeing different subsets of traffic.

- -- 
Peter Bates
Senior Computer Security Officer    Phone: +44(0)2076792049
Information Services Division	    Internal Ext: 32049
University College London
London WC1E 6BT


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP9wHpAAoJELhVoVpEMS6RzFYH/jxbdxR24p0AcD6e3z8qq9LB
zQLce1Ks1PSR2UeKcyzSnwayMCL10lbW/pvJUhX4JUbcxlyYafH8F5/lTsjJtmao
pVg7ZMRHofD6nLe6+N5Mx85ENnFFQLK+YY3X1NtzkNJnIZ/hD9vkQ0zbNFxfi1sb
t39v6Sl0uk/GMd3mJibSRSIQKF8Q+UkScxfPdSn9U5Ais/dVnAccD83T4uriCC8j
Snjyqxi4Ms1LSk3dphJmuNk/G1sKLaWgP/pYpi32pOp4BpDJX1Mrr+0DVqF8hE8G
ntfXNniMhsYRdBx6LAoiPa2LCYk76lsKIVTDyfSaIxMOE7qbEnZwwfiHhS+jg50=
=49/+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----