[Oisf-users] Allowing empty rules file?

Duane Howard duane.security at gmail.com
Thu Sep 26 20:27:04 UTC 2013


Filed.
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/977

Sorry for the delay.

./d


On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Peter Manev <petermanev at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Duane Howard <duane.security at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Yeah, there are 11 other rules files enabled in the config (the same ones
> > from the previous run where it doesn't stop) so it looks like Suricata is
> > just complaining and stopping. Any configuration changes to be made here
> to
> > allow this, or is this a bug?
> >
>
> Yes I think this is a bug - would you please post bug report?
> I tried loading a yaml with all the rules commented out and there was
> no issue. If there is one rule file that it is empty - it would err
> out.
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Peter Manev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-users/attachments/20130926/9334f0c2/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Oisf-users mailing list