[Oisf-users] Packet Loss
Cooper F. Nelson
cnelson at ucsd.edu
Thu Jun 5 18:53:18 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I'll second this. Packet drops under 1% should be considered acceptable.
Isn't it also the case that packets could be dropped because they were
broken in some way. E.g., missing a fragment or failing a checksum?
On 6/5/2014 11:49 AM, Peter Manev wrote:
>
> Judging from your output of stats.log -
>
> capture.kernel_packets | RxPFReth1516 | 86380604
> capture.kernel_drops | RxPFReth1516 | 195847
>
> this is actually - 0.22% loss..... for that particular thread. If
> all of them share the same result (with 22k rules) ... I would say you
> are doing quite alright.
>
- --
Cooper Nelson
Network Security Analyst
UCSD ACT Security Team
cnelson at ucsd.edu x41042
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTkLyeAAoJEKIFRYQsa8FWgNkH/11ZYmq1PfQX0JTzonXr+Ifq
sErnlo9TEOPUEkc8o7bX9/gF9yrDfCgUlVyHkjB35aPEytGXKQs+ezeuf76XdZ62
dwTDL02AZBN+pYVp2s4YQyJWtCZHy60lz2AItr5xkw4hqVqbgbDbhRVLFiEJIP6W
0+QoWb+sAbNVee6X2VT66d//YEA10Wkm07iRYScAZ/1MJtpERT1ZmbHy7dlYkUzg
unh7poNw4XwsvnNqmepIVScv3sKDdeIe0z7sZrgmIVQtKBF/GKRWEyMczJG/NlGk
ZA/kBYwzTEFQSz7z+edc8491jWk6WbmkjK4h+F3YCYakQiw8BR5o82tgv2fMIKs=
=/IWi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Oisf-users
mailing list