[Oisf-users] (no subject)
Cooper F. Nelson
cnelson at ucsd.edu
Mon Mar 24 13:10:02 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Another trick to minimize packet drops is to compile suricata with the
'-O3' gcc optimization.
I tried restarting suricata with "buffer-size: 0" as I suggested and can
confirm it doesn't drop packets at startup. I'll see how it performs
under load during the day.
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth21 | 154178
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth21 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth22 | 182341
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth22 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth23 | 121665
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth23 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth24 | 238187
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth24 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth25 | 201667
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth25 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth26 | 135360
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth26 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth27 | 129307
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth27 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth28 | 139396
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth28 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth29 | 128565
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth29 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth210 | 164600
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth210 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth211 | 135173
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth211 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth212 | 138846
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth212 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth213 | 119298
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth213 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth214 | 215118
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth214 | 0
> capture.kernel_packets | AFPacketeth215 | 104013
> capture.kernel_drops | AFPacketeth215 | 0
On 3/24/2014 5:23 AM, Peter Manev wrote:
>
> Sorry , I sent the previous e-mail too fast :)
> You have :
> tcp.reassembly_gap | AFPacketeth78 | 5901
>
> which can be the reason for your packet drops.
> From what you have posted and describe in the mail (stats.log) - the
> packet loss i minimal and justified maybe (reassembly gaps)
>
> I am not sure what is it that you are trying to solve/achieve .... - 0
> packet drops?
>
- --
Cooper Nelson
Network Security Analyst
UCSD ACT Security Team
cnelson at ucsd.edu x41042
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTMC6qAAoJEKIFRYQsa8FW/z8H/2fXMsSN10QMxg7Hvo6sQhbL
xZynW9XuBqs0FQOuo8PdkPt3JTRcYJlTheDeDsMfoan7jGikHYb0zXEjL8tW2li4
HWE9yc73XhGK9ym852amBVKvtfsdG0j3JdR/nQvGouZAfpSOzuUC1KS2qrnqVE2A
YhP4jCJVMfC7uezHf8G4emaGb6n25X6RsQY8/2sJWVMqRmkVUk05f/MhSRmLg+H2
7Yz5b2JxgEBQ2IDHxGgRlMm6s2FqpX3pvTFYxpzeA9v0y0ha0PagGMuWb1mIG7R8
wFowERs3Z1FvjjcisDdERhdBlC57MY2m+qdaevsW9tZgmAJQP5SR9SFIfyDusdg=
=bQ+n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Oisf-users
mailing list