[Oisf-users] Suricata 2.1beta3 vs 2.0.7

[modversion]

It seems that 2.0.7 work better than 2.1beta3.
What's the bandwidth you protect by suricata ? 10Gbps or 20Gbps ?

2015-04-30 23:00 GMT+08:00 Yasha Zislin <coolyasha at hotmail.com>:

> I have tweaked my configuration to have Suricata 2.0.7 run with minimal
> packet loss less than 0.01%. This set up does use a ton of RAM 95% of 140GB.
> As soon as I switch to Suricata 2.1beta3 and run it with the same config,
> I get 50% packet loss but RAM utilization stays around 50%.
>
> What was changed to have such a big impact?
>
> P.S. I am using PF_RING.
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Suricata IDS Users mailing list: oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org
> Site: http://suricata-ids.org | Support: http://suricata-ids.org/support/
> List: https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
> Suricata User Conference November 4 & 5 in Barcelona:
> http://oisfevents.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-users/attachments/20150430/57970227/attachment-0002.html>