[Oisf-users] autofp vs workers - updated comparison?

Cooper F. Nelson cnelson at ucsd.edu
Tue Jul 21 17:07:45 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This is a great idea.  I had wanted something like an extra FIFO for
spillover in cases like this; but this approach is just as good.

Is this in the kernel yet?  If so, what revision?

On 7/20/2015 9:36 AM, Eric Leblond wrote:
> Yes but this is without considering the great work by some guys at
> Google ;) They have implemented an option in af_packet called
> rollover that send the packet to another socket in case of
> contention. I've proposed a PR implementing that mode in Suricata. It
> has shown some dramatic improvement regarding packet loss in workers
> mode. I hope Victor will merge that soon and that it will be
> available in next beta.

- -- 
Cooper Nelson
Network Security Analyst
UCSD ACT Security Team
cnelson at ucsd.edu x41042
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVrnxhAAoJEKIFRYQsa8FWgKYH/11m0i6McNUOcLFX5CBvX7JU
BCd4811MpXvjdYPyhtDtGghwvpwSzCAYMcO/9KcIXh+SoCxjHdwki/523H1s5IBR
kdCMVGyOwmZW1FvjUHs2EzGR95dZXClrEmDy8/yVQ4lcSxIoBAkpbv/m8ROihJYM
VsLJO3nkpyq5bQAHul3G73IFjo7gN/EtlAXwhWJbYhAu9YZI3K+uR89xlb6eQPnQ
Lu7xBBo57Zj85eq9vehGBK3+PRiNLjXGbiiqwXkoGQr30uriw2GtfyIWHbicu/vG
W+etUUv93+DpzzKRXpdiWNxTXJwANFgJkBB26NY+pvrXk7T1JQDLn87nEbDiTX0=
=Ns/8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Oisf-users mailing list