[Oisf-users] Comparative test between Palo Alto and Suricata

Andreas Moe moe.andreas at gmail.com
Sat Mar 21 06:40:41 UTC 2015

Sorry for the spam. But what type og Palo Alto are you using, will the test
be controlled (pcap replays as an ex.) Anf so on. Just very curious about
your setup.
21. mars 2015 07:38 skrev "Andreas Moe" <moe.andreas at gmail.com>:

> This sounds like a cool test. But as coop was onto, setting palo altos fw
> functions agaist suricta would be a strange comparrison. But checking the
> IDS/IPS function in Palo Alto against suricata woould be cool.
> 21. mars 2015 00:05 skrev "Michał Purzyński" <michalpurzynski1 at gmail.com>:
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:38 PM, None None <electrophobe at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > experience thus far has been that Suricata decimates the Palo Alto I am
>> > testing in terms of detection accuracy and blocking of attacks.
>> >
>> > What is the best way for me to submit my findings?
>> Submit them right here :-) We are glad to hear someone invested his
>> time and energy into comparison, and might have a meaningful
>> discussion.
>> Cargo-cult-security is the term I can't stop thinking about every time
>> I hear about yet another silver bullet "buy us, power on, all your
>> security problems are gone".
>> _______________________________________________
>> Suricata IDS Users mailing list: oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org
>> Site: http://suricata-ids.org | Support: http://suricata-ids.org/support/
>> List: https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
>> Training now available: http://suricata-ids.org/training/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-users/attachments/20150321/cecf6785/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Oisf-users mailing list