[Oisf-users] IPSec handshake and AF-Packet
'Andreas Herz'
andi at geekosphere.org
Fri Nov 27 11:34:44 UTC 2015
On 26/11/15 at 12:33, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
> There are no rules triggered associated with VPN.
>
> When you run TCPDump, you see traffic on the inbound interface but no traffic on the other interface.
>
> Only use the packet copying of AF-Packet mode. No other bridging.
I don't use AF-Packet mode this way, but i use NFQUEUE. Is it possible
to try NFQUEUE mode to compare it with AF-Packet mode?
But for now i have no other idea so far, maybe someelse has more
insight.
> - interface: eth0
> threads: 6
> cluster-id: 99
> cluster-type: cluster_flow
> defrag: yes
> use-mmap: yes
> buffer-size: 64535
> copy-mode: ips
> copy-iface: p1p1
> - interface: p1p1
> threads: 6
> cluster-id: 98
> cluster-type: cluster_flow
> copy-mode: ips
> copy-iface: eth0
> defrag: yes
> buffer-size: 64535
> use-mmap: yes
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Herz [mailto:andi at geekosphere.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 1:56 AM
> To: Leonard Jacobs
> Cc: oisf-users at lists.openinfosecfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [Oisf-users] IPSec handshake and AF-Packet
>
> On 25/11/15 at 18:03, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
> > Well here is what we have discovered so far. There appears to be an
> > incompatibility between SonicWALL's Global VPN Client version
> > 4.9.4.0305 or higher. Possibly version 4.9.0 too but we have not
> > tested that version yet. We know for sure that version 4.2.6.0305
> > works fine.
>
> Does it trigger any rules?
>
> > The symptom is IKE Phase 1 does not complete when IPSec VPN handshake
> > traffic passes through the IPS set to AF-packet mode. We have not
> > tested NFQUEUE mode.
>
> How did you configure the AF-packet mode exactly? Do you use bridging?
>
> > SonicWALL obviously changed something in their Global VPN Client
> > software.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Leonard
> >
> > -----Original Message----- From: Oisf-users
> > [mailto:oisf-users-bounces at lists.openinfosecfoundation.org] On Behalf
> > Of Victor Julien Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 7:07 AM To:
> > oisf-users at lists.openinfosecfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Oisf-users]
> > IPSec handshake and AF-Packet
> >
> > On 25-11-15 13:56, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
> > > Experiencing IPSec handshake being stopped in AF-Packet mode.
> > > Setting defrag to no seems to help and connection is establushed but
> > > sometimes seems to have latency. Sometimes connection is just
> > > stopped. If connection is already established when Suricata is
> > > started then connection stays established. What could be causing
> > > this issue?
> >
> > When reporting issues like this it's helpful if you can add more
> > details, pcaps, log messages, anything.
> >
> > -- --------------------------------------------- Victor Julien
> > http://www.inliniac.net/ PGP: http://www.inliniac.net/victorjulien.asc
> > ---------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________ Suricata IDS Users
> > mailing list: oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org Site:
> > http://suricata-ids.org | Support: http://suricata-ids.org/support/
> > List:
> > https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
> > Suricata User Conference November 4 & 5 in Barcelona:
> > http://oisfevents.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________ Suricata IDS Users
> > mailing list: oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org Site:
> > http://suricata-ids.org | Support: http://suricata-ids.org/support/
> > List:
> > https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
> > Suricata User Conference November 4 & 5 in Barcelona:
> > http://oisfevents.net
>
> --
> Andreas Herz
>
--
Andreas Herz
More information about the Oisf-users
mailing list