[OISF/outreachy] Repetition of similar issues

[Shivani Bhardwaj]

Hi, Vidushi!

On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 7:35 PM Vidushi Agrawal via Outreachy
<outreachy at lists.openinfosecfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Redmine tickets #2893 and #2851 seem to indicate the same issue which has already been fixed in PR https://github.com/OISF/suricata-update/pull/116. Did I miss something?
>
No, they aren't. 2851 has an open PR which tends to fix the cases
where suricata-update does not properly takes actions on the files
defined under the `ignore` section in update.yaml file. However, one
should not be required to add *deleted.rules to the `ignore` section
in update.yaml or command line option at all. It should happen by
default. If you check `suricata-update -h`, you'll find that
corresponding to the `--ignore <pattern>` option, we mention `default:
*deleted.rules`. Since the *deleted.rules still get loaded, this needs
to be fixed.

> Regards,
> Vidushi
> _______________________________________________
> Outreachy mailing list
> Outreachy at lists.openinfosecfoundation.org
> https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/listinfo/outreachy



-- 
Shivani