[OISF/outreachy] Repetition of similar issues

[Vidushi Agrawal]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:24 PM Shivani Bhardwaj <
sbhardwaj at openinfosecfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hi, Vidushi!
>
Hi Shivani,

> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 7:35 PM Vidushi Agrawal via Outreachy
> <outreachy at lists.openinfosecfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Redmine tickets #2893 and #2851 seem to indicate the same issue which
> has already been fixed in PR
> https://github.com/OISF/suricata-update/pull/116. Did I miss something?
> >
> No, they aren't. 2851 has an open PR which tends to fix the cases
> where suricata-update does not properly takes actions on the files
> defined under the `ignore` section in update.yaml file. However, one
> should not be required to add *deleted.rules to the `ignore` section
> in update.yaml or command line option at all. It should happen by
> default. If you check `suricata-update -h`, you'll find that
> corresponding to the `--ignore <pattern>` option, we mention `default:
> *deleted.rules`. Since the *deleted.rules still get loaded, this needs
> to be fixed.
>

Thank you for the clarification.
So ideally update.yaml shouldn't have *deleted.rules in the `ignore`
section and should still ignore *deleted.rules. Did I get it right?

>
> > Regards,
> > Vidushi
> > _______________________________________________
> > Outreachy mailing list
> > Outreachy at lists.openinfosecfoundation.org
> > https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/listinfo/outreachy
>
>
>
> --
> Shivani
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/outreachy/attachments/20190325/d70be6ac/attachment.html>