[Oisf-devel] Better PF_RING performance with workers run-mode now instead of autofp

[Peter Manev]

Hi,
What is the diff percentage wise?  Like 10%,5%?
What do you mean "performance" - is that less cpu/mem usage or less drops
or..?
Just out of curiosity.
Thanks
On 10 Jan 2012 21:05, "Martin Holste" <mcholste at gmail.com> wrote:

> Using 7beb5cdf585514c30034f03579f90d179d8fc931 from a few months ago,
> we had better performance with autofp, but now with
> f773942ce0eb5fb74d85250b9da9f04bd26f9905, (HEAD as of yesterday) we're
> seeing much better performance with workers run-mode.  Anyone else
> experience a shift like this recently?  I can't tell if it was the new
> bugfix for http_header in server responses or another code addition
> that changed things, but it's a night-and-day difference now.
> _______________________________________________
> Oisf-devel mailing list
> Oisf-devel at openinfosecfoundation.org
> http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-devel/attachments/20120110/4ab5f82b/attachment-0002.html>