[Oisf-users] Packets stucked in Nfqueue when running inline
Eric Leblond
eric at regit.org
Tue Jun 21 08:08:30 UTC 2011
Hello,
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 19:36 -0500, Fernando Ortiz wrote:
> Thank you so much for your suggestion.
>
>
> I compiled the last revision from git. The same problem. I followed
> your steps:
>
>
> >> * Flush iptables rules (to block the packet counter in /proc)
> >> * Wait a few seconds for delivery of all packets
>
> ips2 ~]# cat /proc/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue
> 1 640 8 2 65535 0 0 166919 1
> 2 -4290 9 2 65535 0 0 166920 1
>
>
> >> * Get the number of packets queued from /proc (equal to last
> number before 1 in the proc file)
>
>
> (RecvNFQ-Q1) Pkts 166919, Bytes 107024647, Errors 0
> (RecvNFQ-Q2) Pkts 166920, Bytes 106693226, Errors 0
>
>
> >> * Stop suricata
> >> * Retrieve NFQ packets statistics in the log output (Pkts
> accepted
> >> %"PRIu32", dropped %"PRIu32", replaced %"PRIu32)
>
>
> Q1-> Pkts accepted 166705, dropped 206, replaced 0
> Q2-> Pkts accepted 166692, dropped 219, replaced 0
>
>
> So, in Q1 166705 + 206 = 166911 = 166919 - 8
> Same in Q2 166692 + 219 = 266911 = 166920 - 9
>
>
> You are right, these 17 packets are not seen by suricata, therefore,
> no one make a verdict and they are stucked in the queues waiting for
> one.
>
>
> I am not sure where to begin looking for this issue.
This is really weird, I will try to look at it.
> Another question, is it normal those 425 dropped packets? Right now
> Suricata is receiving 10Mbps in average, I think less. But in the
> future they want me to install one that support more than 700 Mbps.
> But I am a little worry about those dropped packets and of course, the
> "stucked" ones.
If packet are blocked, this is because Suricata has decided to block it.
If I remember correctly this can be due to bad checksum or things like
that.
BR,
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> 2011/6/20 Eric Leblond <eric at regit.org>
> Hello,
>
> Le lundi 20 juin 2011 à 12:34 -0500, Fernando Ortiz a écrit :
> > Hello, I am running suricata 1.1beta2 (rev ) inline with
> this command:
> >
> >
> > suricata -c /etc/suricata/suricata.yaml -q1 -q2 -D
> >
> > Everything seems to work just fine, but when I check
> nfnetlink_queue,
> > i see there are some packets in queue waiting for verdict.
> >
> >
> > @ips2 ~]# cat /proc/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue
> >
> > 1 10893 555 2 65535 0 0 169915460 1
> > 2 -4282 552 2 65535 0 0 169915475 1
> >
> >
> > This happens most at night. Traffic is around 15 Mb/s with
> pikes at 20
> > Mb/s. The packets stucked are a few compared with the total
> number of
> > packets processed by Suricata. No problems reported by
> anyone in the
> > network.
>
>
> I've rarely looked at this proc file when using
> nfnetlink_queue. I sadly
> can not tell if it is frequent.
>
> What I can tell, is that suricata did not reach an nfnetlink
> overrun (it
> should have restarted the packet counter). Suricata does
> sequential
> reading and thus this is not a read problem (people are not
> complaining). One of the possibility is that some packets
> remained
> blocked in suricata.
>
> I see one possiblity to check this :
> * Flush iptables rules (to block the packet counter
> in /proc)
> * Wait a few seconds for delivery of all packets
> * Get the number of packets queued from /proc (equal to
> last
> number before 1 in the proc file)
> * Stop suricata
> * Retrieve NFQ packets statistics in the log output (Pkts
> accepted
> %"PRIu32", dropped %"PRIu32", replaced %"PRIu32)
>
> With that we will be able to compare the number of queued
> packets to the
> number packet received and answer by suricata. If suricata has
> not seen
> the 555 packets queued, there is a problem before reaching
> suricata.
>
> > If I bypassed Suricata (iptables -F) packets are still there
> until I
> > kill suricata process.
>
>
> This part is normal, the packet are in a waiting stage and are
> freed
> when the listening process terminate (queue flush). Iptables
> can not be
> used to clear these packets.
>
> BR,
>
>
>
--
Eric Leblond
Blog: http://home.regit.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-users/attachments/20110621/bcf59963/attachment.sig>
More information about the Oisf-users
mailing list