[Oisf-users] Alerts' suppression

Victor Julien lists at inliniac.net
Mon Jul 22 07:27:50 UTC 2013


On 07/17/2013 02:28 PM, Kirill Sluchanko wrote:
> OK, let's start from the other end.
> 
> My task is to remove alerts for some rule from unified2.alerts as these
> alerts uselessly poisoning Snorby's database.  
> 
> As I got no replies on previous message I've tried to experiment with
> threshold settings. First of all I've enabled drop.log (as, for some
> reasons, it is the only way I can use to find if the packets are
> dropped).
> 
> Then I've enabled threshold file in suricata.yaml and create
> threshold.config with following content:
> 
>   suppress gen_id 1, sig_id 2200075
> 
> Restart Suricata - and first try failed. Too few records in drop.log. I
> think it means that packets matching the rule is not dropped - and when
> I have commented the string above and restarted Suricata, drop.log shows
> that packets of interest are dropping.
> 
> Well, let's try another way - I have changed content of threshold.conf
> to following string:
> 
>   threshold gen_id 1, sig_id 2200075, type threshold, track by_src,
> count 1000,  seconds 1000
> 
> Restart Suricata - still no luck; drop.log shows that nothing is
> dropped. Comment the string and restart Suricata - drop.log shows that
> packets are dropping.
> 
> The question is - what's wrong with my approach? Or maybe it is
> something wrong with Suricata? For example, I suspect that 'suppress' or
> 'threshold' usage can influence dropped packets logging.

How are you starting Suricata?

-- 
---------------------------------------------
Victor Julien
http://www.inliniac.net/
PGP: http://www.inliniac.net/victorjulien.asc
---------------------------------------------




More information about the Oisf-users mailing list