[Oisf-users] bonds and af_packet

Nick Price nick at spun.io
Sun Jun 18 15:30:37 UTC 2017

It should - in my experience you will need to make sure to set options
(like promisc) on the bonded interface as well as the two physical
interfaces, but it should work as expected.

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 9:29 AM, erik clark <philosnef at gmail.com> wrote:

> I cant find a clear answer on this. Does af_packet work appropriately on a
> bond interface of two interfaces that are af_packet capable? Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> Suricata IDS Users mailing list: oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org
> Site: http://suricata-ids.org | Support: http://suricata-ids.org/support/
> List: https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-users/attachments/20170618/6c04d829/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Oisf-users mailing list