[Oisf-users] dump-counters 'not implemented'?

Peter Manev petermanev at gmail.com
Fri Feb 5 03:37:44 UTC 2016


I was talking with Eric about this as well a few days ago. I think it needs to be reimplemented again - as there were a number of code changes in 3.0.

Do you mind opening a ticket for this?

Thank you

Peter Manev

> On 5 feb. 2016, at 02:15, Duane Howard <duane.security at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm testing out 3.0 STABLE, and seem to be unable to get 'dump-counters' to work through the command socket. When I revert to 2.0.11 this works again. Is there something that changed that I'm missing? We're building our own package, so if build flags or something changed that could be part of it? Anyway, this seems like odd behavior to me.
> me at somebox:~$ suricatasc
> Command list: shutdown, command-list, help, version, uptime, running-mode, capture-mode, conf-get, dump-counters, reload-rules, register-tenant-handler, unregister-tenant-handler, register-tenant, reload-tenant, unregister-tenant, iface-stat, iface-list, quit
> >>> version
> Success:
> "3.0 RELEASE"
> >>> running-mode
> Success:
> "workers"
> >>> capture-mode
> Success:
> >>> dump-counters
> Error:
> "not implemented"
> -Duane
> _______________________________________________
> Suricata IDS Users mailing list: oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org
> Site: http://suricata-ids.org | Support: http://suricata-ids.org/support/
> List: https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
> Suricata User Conference November 9-11 in Washington, DC: http://oisfevents.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-users/attachments/20160205/7b52fac2/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Oisf-users mailing list