[Oisf-users] dump-counters 'not implemented'?

[Duane Howard]

Done: https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/1695

Just as a note, this is a blocker for us rolling this out to our fleet as
we use the socket to collect stats for monitoring and alerting on the
health of our fleet. Sorry for not catching this earlier, we just finished
the rollout of 2.0.11 and I was focused on that.

- Duane

On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Peter Manev <petermanev at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was talking with Eric about this as well a few days ago. I think it
> needs to be reimplemented again - as there were a number of code changes in
> 3.0.
>
> Do you mind opening a ticket for this?
>
> Thank you
>
> Regards,
> Peter Manev
>
> On 5 feb. 2016, at 02:15, Duane Howard <duane.security at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm testing out 3.0 STABLE, and seem to be unable to get 'dump-counters'
> to work through the command socket. When I revert to 2.0.11 this works
> again. Is there something that changed that I'm missing? We're building our
> own package, so if build flags or something changed that could be part of
> it? Anyway, this seems like odd behavior to me.
>
> me at somebox:~$ suricatasc
> Command list: shutdown, command-list, help, version, uptime, running-mode,
> capture-mode, conf-get, dump-counters, reload-rules,
> register-tenant-handler, unregister-tenant-handler, register-tenant,
> reload-tenant, unregister-tenant, iface-stat, iface-list, quit
> >>> version
> Success:
> "3.0 RELEASE"
> >>> running-mode
> Success:
> "workers"
> >>> capture-mode
> Success:
> "AF_PACKET_DEV"
> *>>> dump-counters*
> *Error:*
>
> *"not implemented"*
>
> -Duane
>
> _______________________________________________
> Suricata IDS Users mailing list: oisf-users at openinfosecfoundation.org
> Site: http://suricata-ids.org | Support: http://suricata-ids.org/support/
> List: https://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/oisf-users
> Suricata User Conference November 9-11 in Washington, DC:
> http://oisfevents.net
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openinfosecfoundation.org/pipermail/oisf-users/attachments/20160205/8bea0372/attachment-0002.html>